74549 (73%) 28256 (27%)
74549 (73%) people have pressed this button, while 28256 (27%) did not.
World peace is achieved
but
Every position of power in the world is replaced with a woman
Next


MR_BACON9 years ago
As long as the girls are smart I don't see a downside!

mouse9 years ago
Exuse me, allow me to kill the 24% of people who did not say yes.

MRINFINITYDOTCOM3 years ago
I'll genocide the 76% of the "people" who said no, that is literally sexism
Load more replies

MNITIMMY9 years ago
FOUR THE GREATER GOOD MAN KI-er umm WOMAN KIND!

TheRealLobit4 years ago
yes
Load more replies

xx.fob_otaku.xx9 years ago
As long as she is a PROPER feminist, then that's perfectly fine. And by "proper" I mean she actually believes in gender equality and supports the lgbtq+ community. If she's fat shamming and wanting women to be superior and shit like that then fuck no

DarkShark1279 years ago
What's so wrong with a woman instead of Donald Trump?

jaslikestuna3 months ago
sooo... how are we doing today
Load more replies

LinkLegend0049 years ago
That's the downside? You sexist!

WizeNinja9 years ago
I don't see a down side.... (I'm a guy)

Heartbreaker149 years ago
YOU SEXIST MOTHERFUCKER!

sovietunionftw8 years ago
Go suck a dick mother fucker
Load more replies

BloodRedRose8 years ago
Not all women are feminists or Hillary Clintons. What if the woman in power is strong, smart, and peaceful?

Scott Cavender12 years ago
The fear I would have is getting a feminist in charge. That's it. A woman who has actual equality beliefs would be fine but a feminist is a no. Most feminists I know are awful and want gender roll reversal, not gender equality.

TrashLanternFish3603 years ago
This comment may be offensive. Press to show.
Load more replies

RandomnessInc8 years ago
Whoever didn't press the button is sexist, just because a woman is in charge doesn't mean she will suck.

Dabnad4 years ago
No, if the roles were reversed would you press it?

wrong choice mofo9 years ago
It may get pretty unbalanced, and like others have said, we might get a raging feminist. But, then, again, the nations would have no war because the politicians wouldn't talk to one another.

Houseofbrick8 years ago
Why is every one acting like there"s no downside? If you"re a man or care about equality at all then there"s a DEFINITE downside. Men aren't allowed to have ANY power at all, not even jobs like management let alone government stuff. Even if a man is more c...[Show full comment]

Yeet1237 years ago
THANK YOU
Load more replies

TrashyWaffe6 years ago
Well that"s just sexist. and I'm not even a feminist, or a female

UNSC_GA_Dash9 years ago
Hey. All you feminists in the comments. Shut the fuck up. We don't care

Benz0ver9 years ago
Downside? Who gives af? Sexists?

Yeetcoeschann6 years ago
NO!!!

yolo4life7 years ago
No worry I'll just have sex with the leader then I will be in control even better than before

Poomanpeebird7 years ago
For world peace is not yet achieved but never with women. Were doomed #dont press it

xX0Shelley0Xx7 years ago
As long as they’re not annoying feminists, I’m fine with that lol

Rexina7 years ago
Where is The upside?

Element_Edgy7 years ago
SUCK IT, TRUMP

-Delta-7 years ago
Next election men could be elected, so it will eventually even out to 50/50

Kittenlover1017 years ago
*cough* sexist *Cough*

RadioChick7 years ago
There"s no downside to this one

VexaGrimwoe8 years ago
All the people who didn't press that button are sexist.

CyndiHuddleston8 years ago
As long as she was intelligent enough it wouldn't matter, for the love of God don't put some idiot with out two brain cells be in charge.

karieveretta8 years ago
I hate how people think woman shouldn't be in charge because what?

Titanic218 years ago
No downside. Except for the gynophobic. And the sexist.

Dontworryaboutit7 years ago
No there is a downside you just gotta look past the obvious if you look at my comment where explain why this is worst than you think it is, and it is the downside you think it will be so shhhh with this sexist stuff. Challenge yourself to look beyond the o...[Show full comment]

Mai-chan8 years ago
Wow... sexist much?

surdegdencoole8 years ago
i respect wahmen

HannahKelly8 years ago
I don't understand why this could possibly be bad

Alexspook4078 years ago
Im a feminist 😂 so this is bad how?

PotatoShark158 years ago
Downside?

ristkell-youtuber-8 years ago
not if hillary becomes president

Starkitty8 years ago
um there"s no down side here. World peace is achieved so people shouldn't be upset by this.

GARIANNWILLIAMS8 years ago
i wish i can fly

Burstbusterz8 years ago
No downside, you sexist f*ck.

BrutalDeathDecisions9 years ago
Days go by... I send more boys out... They're gone the girls took them...

Christa Rose Lord9 years ago
I see literally no downside to this

Dick Fucker from Dirty village in slovak republic9 years ago
What fucking moron pres button!?

pwninggrenades8 years ago
idiots
Load more replies

xaiver9 years ago
lol this question suks!

YungManzi9 years ago
Nah man. something like world peace is too damn broad for me to make a clear decision. Like does world peace mean no conflict at all? Plus if only women have positions of power the only valuable men in the world would be really attractive ones. ...[Show full comment]

Brady the awesome guy9 years ago
I'm fine with it if the woman agree with the men and the men agree with the woman

Bisexualacefluxdemigirlflux4 years ago
And don't forget the nonbeeneries!

FTBacon9 years ago
So there would be malinists???

Raine9 years ago
There period

CMHammond9 years ago
If every position of power had a woman in charge, it would be sexism. There are still women in charge in some positions in our reality, just not enough, which is also partly down to sexism. If you want world peace, eliminating sexism is one step closer to it.

Bondkid19 years ago
This comment may be offensive. Press to show.

Darth Vader9 years ago
equalitites is found nowhere!

Gaming Oshawott9 years ago
I will not!
Load more comments